Evaluation: Editing/Post Production - Skills
For this module, there were three different assignments:
Non-Sync Drama Editing, Documentary Editing and Comedy editing. In this
evaluation, I will discuss each project in detail; about what they entailed,
what my contributions were and what skills I gained from this module.
The first project we engaged was to create a 5-minute edit
of a Non-Sync Drama called ‘Night Journey’, we were given all the raw footage,
voiceover and atmos sounds to work with, and had to create a strong narrative with
what we were given. Firstly, we went through the scripts to decide the style of
story we wanted to take, and what audio bites we needed to do this. The idea of
the audience for this edit was wide-range, because the story follows a cannibal
on a train journey, we decided to use this and aim for teenagers and higher,
and to do this, added effect to darken the footage of the train to make it
slightly more tense and interesting to this particular audience sector.
I feel that this project was quite successful, however there
are many features of the finished product I would have changed or worked more
on. One of those is the ending, I do enjoy the ending, as my partner and I came
up with the idea of making the description of the cannibal’s job drift as the protagonist
falls in and out of consciousness, and almost dreams thoughts about what will
happen to him. However this ending effects the pacing of the piece, the
beginning and middle starts to build up tension and slowly gain pace, however
the ending slows right down, almost becoming an anti-climax and making it
boring and disappointing from an audience perspective.
I believe that the beginning of the piece however, works
really well. My partner and I worked hard on introducing the piece to the
audience in a way that would entice them to watch the film, and also after
reviewing other colleagues’ work, we wanted a completely different and creative
start, as I noticed many had used similar beginnings.
We decided to follow the rules of editing drama by Walter
Murch, who stated that ‘Emotion was the most important feature to show through
your edit’, and therefore we concentrated on the importance of sound. We spent
time taking out pops and clicks in sound files in Soundtrack Pro and
re-importing them into Final Cut, as well as choosing parts of script and
reconstructing the story to create more drama and empathy for the character
from the viewer. I do feel that the sound could have been improved with more
time, as we didn’t edit all the sound through Soundtrack Pro, and some of the
atmos tracks were rushed at the end of piece. Unfortunately, the atmos tracks
we were given weren’t very good quality and needed a lot of time to edit,
which, due to bad time management, we weren’t able to achieve to the best of
our ability, however we worked with what we had to help create more drama, for
example, editing pans and levels on the atmos track of a train passing, to give
it more of a realistic and dramatic effect. I feel that if we had created a
schedule, we would have managed the project better and approached the project
in a more balanced way.
I believe that both my partner and I contributed to the work
evenly; I took more of an editor role, whereas Jessica helped direct the piece
and create a narrative.
This project allowed me to learn new skills in Soundtrack
Pro, in regard to working on clicks and pops. I also enjoyed working on
Non-Sync and problem solving the footage to make it work as a narrative. This
project allowed me to learn more about Final Cut Pro, for example shortcuts as
well setting up sequences correctly.
I feel this project was successful and we worked well
together to make the piece dramatic and creative, and I would spend more time
on sound if I had managed my time correctly.
The second project we were assigned was to take an edit of a
Documentary called ‘In A Climber’s Hands’ and edit out all the problems and
make it our own. My partner Alli, and myself decided that we were going to
create a brand new documentary with the footage, because we prefer to edit with
a fresh start rather than sorting through the old one.
The audience for this project was once again a wide range.
The idea was to create a documentary that would appeal to people and make them
interested in rock climbing, which could be a range of age groups.
Overall, I think our outcome for this project worked well.
The first time we presented the project, there were quite a few problems we
noticed. For example, the sound design wasn’t very well put together, as we
decided to create a song and place it into the montages and intervals of
interview, how it make the piece seem disjointed, as the music would appear and
disappear merely with fades, however before deadline, we managed to revise the
sound design by creating a song that lasts the entire piece, with a range of
melodies as well as soft music or beats when the interview occurs. We felt that
this made the piece more whole and flowing, and I also like that we chose a
range of melodies rather than repeating one all the way through, because it
gets boring and almost irritating for the audience.
I think the major feature we struggled with, and could have
improved in the future was the sound in general. Some of the interview sound
wasn’t very good, however when we tried to edit this, it only made it worse.
However I feel with more time we could have researched more into making the
interview sound clearer, however I feel that the revision of the sound design
made the piece more successful.
This project taught me a lot of skills on a range of
programs and topics. For this assignment, I researched documentary editing and
found out the different styles of film there are, and how to make each of them
effective. I used this research to organise what we had to do, as it taught me
that Structure and Style were very important, as well as Story Arc and the
characters. Even though I’ve watched documentaries in the past, the editing
process is very complex and I’ve learnt that editors have to take apart interviews
or sound bites and create a narrative, which could be completely different from
the original interview, however, also stated that ‘the footage must stay true’,
meaning you shouldn’t change people’s views by editing their words.
It also taught me a lot about sound design, and matching
sound to video. I’ve barely used Garageband in the past, so with my partner’s
help, I was able to learn the key features I needed to create a song and export
it for my project. We spent time matching the beats of the music to the change
in shot on screen, which I found really effective. Also, I learnt more about
soundtrack pro when it came to trying to edit the interview sound bites.
When it comes to teamwork, I feel Alli and I worked great
together. We’d always meet and contribute to the work evenly; we’d plan
together and discuss our ideas. It was a very equal and fair production, and
was also very enjoyable. I feel however, as a team, we could have managed our
time better. We’d spend time together doing things one of us could have done
while the other spent time on progressing something else. So in the future, we
should work together, but also independently to bring the project together.
I feel this project was successful, it taught me a lot about
sound design and documentary editing and also my skills in teamwork, and
editing programs.
The third and final project we were given was to edit one or
two scenes from a Comedy called ‘Out O Date’. We were given all the raw footage
and we’re asked to pick and perfect a scene. I chose a scene that was quite
short, so ended up creating an edit with two different scenes. The intended
audience, because it’s a comedy, is once again quite wide ranged. The aim is to
make the audience laugh and therefore this could appeal to anyone.
I enjoyed working on this project, because it was the first
one I got to complete from start to finish on my own. This means that if I ran
into any problems, only I could solve them, and I can work with my ideas,
however working alone does have it’s downside, when you need advice for example
or are stuck on a particular skill or feature, luckily I managed to complete
this project without too many problems.
I feel that the finished comedy is successful. The jingle I
created for the beginning gives a comical feel straight away; therefore the
audience know it’s a comedy as soon as the scene unfolds. The edit, to me,
seems to flow well, changing from a shot of a character speaking to the reverse
shot of the other character’s reaction. I learnt through online research that
it was important to balance this type of shot to allow the audience to feel for
both characters. I think that the visual edit is quite strong, but I did
struggle with some of the sound.
First of all, some of the interview sound isn’t as good as
other sections, so I spend some time trying to edit them, by changing levels,
however some still appear to be more quiet so in the future I’d spend more time
on that. Some of the clips were cut quiet quickly in shoot, so there were times
were there wasn’t any atmosphere in the background, and this was very
noticeable, however I managed to solve this by editing previous atmosphere into
the section and using cross fades to blend them in, I believe some of these
worked very successfully, however others could have been improved.
As this was an individual project, I was in charge of
everything – choosing which scene(s) to edit, the editing process itself as
well as sound design. I enjoyed this challenge because with more responsibility
on myself, I feel I worked more effectively, and was able to interpret the work
in my own way. It also allowed me to work on my skills in sound as well as my
editing skills in final cut pro.
This project allowed me to learn more about the programs. I
learnt more about Final Cut Pro features and shortcuts, which made editing
easier, and more time efficient. I also learned more basics of Garageband and
created a jingle to use and export. As I chose to use some sound from different
clips, I also spent more time learning to sync these with shots, which was very
helpful.
I also learnt about the ideas behind editing comedies, for
example ‘how important timing is, using reaction shots as well as ensuring the
audience are in on a joke beforehand’
Overall I enjoyed working on this project and feel I’ve
approached it successfully. I was able to manage time better because it was
individual work, however still feel I could have done more to the sound design
if I had more time. I’ve learnt a lot about different styles of editing as well
as the different programs I’ve used throughout the module. I feel that the
module has taught me many new skills in regard to editing which have already
benefited me with recent work done.
References: Murch, W., In The Blink Of An Eye, 2nd Edition (2001)
Silman-James Press, U.S
Peters, O., Article: Documentary Editing Tips (2011)
URL: http://digitalfilms.wordpress.com/2011/11/24/documentary-editing-tips/
Word Count: 1967